Crescent City, California
City of Crescent City 2023 annual water quality report (Water Boards 2024 filing), PWS CA0810001. Hardness 48 ppm (sample 6/7/2023). Chlorine residual 1.05 ppm (0.04–1.97). No Measure S-style ban turned up — check the sewer agency on the bill.
- Hardness48 ppm (6/7/2023)
- Chlorine residual1.05 ppm (0.04–1.97)
Best match for Crescent City
Whole-house carbon for chlorine
Check the sanitation district before installing a salt system.
That is chlorine. A whole-house carbon filter with an NSF/ANSI 42 chlorine claim is the usual match. A softener will not take chlorine out.
Some links are affiliate links. If you buy through one, we may earn a commission. That does not change the match, and it is not a medical claim.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
Other options that still fit
Do not buy a softener on this supply
This supply is soft on the published numbers. A salt tank is usually the wrong box unless you are on a well or a different utility. Test the tap before you buy hardness equipment.
Under-sink reverse osmosis
The under-sink RO we actually run is Cloud RO — NSF/ANSI 58, kitchen tap, not a whole-house tank. Check the exact listing if PFAS is why you are shopping. Shop Amazon first for under-sink RO, or buy Cloud direct. Waterdrop is a tankless option if you want that path. A certifier-listed pitcher is the cheap first step. Nobody is paying for a medical claim.
Shop under-sink reverse osmosisBuy Cloud RO directShop Waterdrop reverse osmosisShop PFAS-listed pitchers
On the report
- Water utility
- City of Crescent City Public Works
- Hardness
- Hardness 48 ppm, sample date 6/7/2023. Sum of polyvalent cations present in the water. Quoted as printed. — City of Crescent City 2023 Annual Water Quality Report
- Disinfectant
- Chlorine residual 1.05 ppm (range 0.04–1.97). — City of Crescent City 2023 Annual Water Quality Report
- Brine / salt to the sewer
- Check the sanitation district before installing. No city or sanitation-district residential self-regenerating softener ban like LACSD Measure S or IEUA Ordinance § 2.6 turned up on the pages we opened. That is not a statewide ban finding. Ask the agency on the sewer bill before you cut a brine drain.
Also around here
Extra context besides the utility report and the chart above — geology, an unregulated table, or a published study. Not a second set of printed tap numbers.
- MicroplasticsWHO’s 2019 review examined studies that found microplastic particles in treated tap and bottled water in many places. That is a published-occurrence finding, not a number from this city’s water-quality report, and we do not invent a particles-per-liter count for the tap.Microplastics in drinking-water — World Health Organization
- PFASEPA’s Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule required community systems this size to test 29 PFAS and lithium in 2023–2025. Open the UCMR 5 Data Finder for this PWS. This file does not invent a detection.Fifth Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule — U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Crescent City drinking water on this file is City of Crescent City Public Works, PWS CA0810001. No city or sanitation-district residential self-regenerating softener ban like LACSD Measure S or IEUA Ordinance § 2.6 turned up on the pages we opened. That is not a statewide ban finding. Ask the agency on the sewer bill before you cut a brine drain. This is not a legal opinion.
The opened report prints hardness 48 ppm (sample 6/7/2023). Chlorine residual 1.05 ppm (0.04–1.97). Kitchen shopping stays the Cloud RO / Waterdrop path already used on other cities if a listing is why you are looking.
Sources
- 2023 Annual Water Quality Report (PWS CA0810001) — City of Crescent City / State Water Resources Control Board. Accessed 2026-09-11.
Updated September 11, 2026. A city file is chemistry we can cite plus the sewer rule. No invented detections.